When President Richard Nixon signed the Education Amendments Act in 1972, Title IX of the legislation mandated that no person in the United States, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, or be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. Although the word “sports” never appeared in the statute, Title IX quickly became a driving force in expanding women’s opportunities in athletics.
Nearly four decades later, on July 21, 2010, cheerleading found itself at the center of a pivotal legal test of Title IX’s reach. In a case brought against Quinnipiac University in Hamden, Connecticut, a federal court ruled that competitive cheerleading could not be considered a varsity sport under Title IX. This decision would not only shape cheerleading’s legal and educational status but serve as a flashpoint for its evolution as a recognized sport.
The case began when Quinnipiac University announced it would cut its women’s volleyball program and replace it with a competitive cheerleading team, citing budgetary concerns. The women’s volleyball coach and several athletes sued the university, arguing that competitive cheer did not meet the criteria for a varsity sport and thus did not satisfy Title IX’s requirement to provide equal athletic opportunities for women.
At trial, U.S. District Judge Stefan Underhill found in favor of the volleyball players. He ruled that while competitive cheer may one day become a recognized sport, it was not yet at that stage. He cited several deficiencies: a lack of consistent governing bodies, standardized rules, a defined competition season, and legitimate postseason championships. The evidence presented demonstrated that competitive cheer at the collegiate level lacked the structure required to be considered equal to other varsity sports.
Key to the court’s decision was testimony from Jeff Webb, founder of Varsity and a leading architect of modern competitive cheerleading. Webb acknowledged cheerleading’s immense athletic demands and potential as a legitimate sport but also conceded that it lacked a formalized, unified framework. His statements carried significant weight with the court.
Webb’s testimony underscored what many in the industry already knew: the sport was in a transitional phase. Although cheerleaders at the college level executed professional-level tumbling, stunting, and pyramids, the lack of central governance and uniform rules posed a roadblock to its acceptance as a varsity athletic program.
The court’s 2010 ruling did more than reject cheerleading as a sport for Title IX purposes—it accelerated a wave of reform. Within a year, USA Cheer launched STUNT, a new discipline that removed traditional sideline elements and focused purely on competitive routines with defined rules and standardized scoring. STUNT’s creation was a direct response to the Title IX challenge, designed to offer a version of cheerleading that could be more easily recognized as a sport under federal law.
Meanwhile, Quinnipiac retained its competitive cheer team but rebranded it as an acrobatics & tumbling squad, aligning with the newly formed National Collegiate Acrobatics and Tumbling Association (NCATA). This association focused on developing a sport that combined elements of cheer and gymnastics while providing the organizational clarity demanded by Title IX.
In August 2012, the legal story continued. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Judge Underhill’s ruling. The appellate court acknowledged that competitive cheer “can be physically challenging, requiring competitors to possess strength, agility, and grace,” but concluded that “the time has not yet arrived” for the activity to be recognized as a sport under Title IX.
The appeals court also addressed another critical component of Title IX compliance—how athletes are counted. It rejected Quinnipiac’s effort to count female runners who participated in cross-country, indoor, and outdoor track as three separate athletes. This reinforced the principle that institutions must accurately reflect participation opportunities when assessing Title IX compliance.
The decision was heralded as a victory for women’s sports. Attorney Jonathan Orleans, who represented the volleyball players, stated, “This is a great victory for Quinnipiac’s female student athletes and for women’s collegiate sports.” It underscored the importance of equity not just in opportunity, but in the quality and legitimacy of those opportunities.
But this wasn’t the end of the cheerleading community’s journey. USA Cheer continued building STUNT, and NCATA expanded acrobatics & tumbling across the country. In 2025, both STUNT and A&T achieved a major milestone when each sport was granted NCAA emerging championship status. STUNT was also named one of the fastest growing women’s sports, reflecting its legitimacy and widespread adoption as a competitive collegiate sport. Now, more than 50 colleges have adopted STUNT as a varsity sport. These developments validated the reforms prompted by the 2010 and 2012 rulings.
In parallel, the International Cheer Union (ICU) pursued global recognition for competitive cheer. The ICU gained provisional recognition from the International Olympic Committee (IOC) in 2016 and full recognition in 2021. This milestone marked cheerleading’s transition from an American cultural tradition to a globally acknowledged competitive sport.
Today, the impact of the Quinnipiac ruling is felt in nearly every corner of the cheer world. From increased investment in athlete safety to the formalization of scoring systems and competition formats, the cheer industry evolved rapidly in response to the legal challenges of the early 2010s. Organizations like USA Cheer and the USASF have helped codify rules and promote safe, competitive opportunities for athletes at all levels.
Modern competitive cheerleading features national and international championships, rigorous judging criteria, and distinct divisions based on skill level and age. Events like The Cheerleading Worlds, the ICU World Championships, and the NCA & UCA College Nationals are watched by millions and represent the sport’s elite.
Yet even with these advancements, cheerleading still faces challenges in securing full NCAA recognition. While sports like STUNT and acrobatics & tumbling are gaining ground, traditional competitive cheerleading remains in limbo within the collegiate athletics structure. The echoes of the 2010 decision continue to influence how institutions view and support cheer programs.
From its roots in Ivy League football stands in the late 1800s to the global stage today, cheerleading’s journey has been defined by transformation. The 2010 ruling, initially seen as a setback, became a defining moment that pushed the community toward professionalism, accountability, and long-term viability.
It challenged the cheer community to define what the sport truly stood for—and to prove it could stand on equal ground with any varsity discipline. Cheerleading, often dismissed as an extracurricular activity, proved it belonged in conversations about athleticism, safety, fairness, and recognition. It demanded a place not just on the sidelines, but on the same playing field as other varsity sports.
The story of cheerleading and Title IX is ultimately a story of resilience. Faced with legal rejection, the cheer world responded not with retreat, but with reinvention. It built new competitive formats, created pathways for athletes, and set new standards for safety and performance.
As cheerleading eyes Olympic inclusion and further NCAA integration, its past remains essential. STUNT’s emergence has been more than just a structural fix—it has opened doors for thousands of female athletes to access collegiate athletic programs they otherwise would not have had. By creating a pathway for schools to fund and support new women’s teams, STUNT has expanded educational opportunities and allowed cheerleaders to pursue higher education while competing at the varsity level. It has turned the momentum of a courtroom loss into a foundation for lasting institutional gains. The legacy of the Quinnipiac ruling is no longer just a reminder of what cheerleading lacked—it is now a testament to what cheerleading has built. The Quinnipiac case, the courtrooms, and the questions of legitimacy laid the groundwork for one of the most significant transformations in the history of sport.
Explore the most important moments in cheerleading’s evolution—follow Cheer Daily for in-depth coverage, breaking news, and exclusive cheer history features at cheerdaily.net.
